N
Nempathy
Performance Authority
Total trade spend
$4.2M
Q1 committed
Leakage detected
$312K
7.4% of spend
Accrual gaps
$88K
3 open items
Verified clean
$3.8M
90.5% of spend

Recovery opportunity calculator

Every assumption below is visible and adjustable — nothing is hardcoded
Audit recovery rate
70%
Engagements per year
4
Engagement cost
$25K
Leakage found per engagement
$312K
Recovered per engagement
$218K
Gross recovery, annual
$874K
Net return on fees
12×
Net to EBITDA, after fees
Spend by retailer — committed vs. claimed
Committed
Overclaim
Unverified
Spend status breakdown
90.5%
Verified clean
7.4%
Leakage
2.1%
Accrual gap
Each flag is tested against a sealed commitment

Matching a deduction to a promotion tells you the claim corresponds to something in the system. The ledger tells you what was actually agreed — and that it has not moved since.

See the ledger — and try to break it →
Flagged promotions
Click any row to see detail and recommended action
Retailer Promotion Committed Claimed Variance Issue Status
Claude AI — Analysis summary
$312,000 in potential leakage identified across 2 retailers. Kroger and Albertsons both submitted claims exceeding committed amounts by a combined $92,000 — both flagged for dispute. Walmart's TPR submission matches committed spend but lacks compliance documentation; payment should be withheld pending proof of execution. Target has an open accrual of $88,000 not yet booked — requires resolution before period close to avoid working capital exposure. Costco closed clean with full documentation on file.

Recommended: (1) Open formal disputes with Kroger and Albertsons — $92K recovery opportunity. (2) Request compliance proof from Walmart before releasing payment. (3) Book Target accrual before March 31 close.
Generate dispute letter — Kroger
Generate dispute letter — Albertsons
Request compliance docs — Walmart
Export CFO report
Naomi — Immutable audit ledger
Every entry is tamper-resistant and permanently logged
Secure audit log — Q1 2026
USP 11,151,254 · USP 11,042,641